Journalists Debate Social Security Solvency

Nov 7, 2016 / Michael Natalie, Horsesmouth Assistant Editor

A recent dust-up between the LA Times and Time’s Money Magazine has illuminated some of the difficult solvency questions surrounding Social Security.

In a November piece contextualizing Social Security within the 2016 Presidential election, editor-at-large Penelope Wang remarked that “the program has been running at a deficit since 2010.” This is true if you look at Social Security’s finances purely in terms of benefits paid relative to taxes levied; however, as Michael Hiltzik commented in his column at the LA Times, taxes are not the Social Security system’s only source of income.

The program’s revenues also include the interest on Social Security’s treasury bonds. Accounting for this interest—as the Social Security Trustees do in their reports—leaves the program with a $23 billion dollar surplus for last year. Hiltzik believes Wang’s omission of this interest income in her analysis implies a lack of faith in Social Security’s treasury bonds, which critics frequently deride as “IOUs.”

Wang, Hiltzik, and the Social Security Trustees all acknowledge that the trust fund is set to exhaust in 2034, at which point benefits will fall to 79% of the promised payout. This worst-case-scenario assumes total inaction on the part of Congress.

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE
This material is provided exclusively for use by individuals with an active license to the Savvy Social Security Planning Program. Use of this material is subject to the Social Security Planning Program Agreement and applicable copyright laws. Unauthorized use, reproduction or distribution of this material is a violation of federal law and punishable by civil and criminal penalty. This material is furnished “as is” without warranty of any kind. Its accuracy and completeness is not guaranteed and all warranties express or implied are hereby excluded.

© 2024 Horsesmouth, LLC. All Rights Reserved.